Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M.C. Keegan-Ayer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- M.C. Keegan-Ayer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
County politician, doesn't pass WP:POLITICIAN, all coverage is routine. Rusf10 (talk) 02:00, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:27, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:27, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:27, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- DeleteLocal politician with no "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article". Apart from the official government listing there isn't much coverage to establish notability. Fails WP:GNG and of course, WP:POLITICIAN. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:31, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Local politician has received significant and ongoing coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 11:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Every single person who holds office at the county level always gets purely local media coverage in their own local media — so that coverage is not enough to make a county councillor notable all by itself, because if that were all it took then there would never be any such thing as a non-notable county councillor anymore. But county councillors, in reality, are not accepted as automatically notable just because they exist — to actually get a county councillor into Wikipedia just for being a county councillor per se, the coverage has to nationalize to a degree that marks him or her out as plainly more notable than most other county councillors in most other counties. But the media coverage shown here is purely local and routine, which is not enough to demonstrate that she's of any wider encyclopedic interest. Bearcat (talk) 14:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - fails N. Atsme📞📧 18:23, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable politician with the usual local coverage. I see nothing that distinguishes her from thousands of other local politicians. Papaursa (talk) 02:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NPOL. SportingFlyer talk 05:38, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Just your average local politician, no notability. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 21:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.